<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Googliberty &#187; England</title>
	<atom:link href="http://googliberty.com/tag/england/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://googliberty.com</link>
	<description>Magnify Liberty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 07:34:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>British Whig Party</title>
		<link>http://googliberty.com/british-whig-party</link>
		<comments>http://googliberty.com/british-whig-party#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 22:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[19th Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberty-finder.com/?p=321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Whigs are often described as one of the two original political parties (the other being the Tories) in England and later the United Kingdom from the late 17th to the mid-19th centuries. The Whigs&#8217; origin lay in constitutional monarchism and opposition to absolute rule. Both parties began as loose groupings or tendencies, but became [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <strong>Whigs</strong> are often described as one of the two original political parties (the other being the Tories) in England and later the United Kingdom from the late 17th to the mid-19th  centuries. The Whigs&#8217; origin lay in <a title="Constitutional monarchism" href="http://liberty-finder.com/constitutional-monarchism">constitutional  monarchism</a> and opposition to absolute rule. Both parties began as  loose groupings or tendencies, but became quite formal by 1784, with the  ascension of Charles James Fox as the leader of a  reconstituted &#8220;Whig&#8221; party ranged against the governing party of the new  &#8220;Tories&#8221; under William Pitt the Younger.</p>
<p>The Whig party slowly evolved during the 18th century. The Whig  tendency supported the great  aristocratic families, the Protestant Hanoverian succession and  toleration for nonconformist Protestants (the &#8220;dissenters,&#8221; such as Presbyterians), while the Tories  supported the exiled Stuart royal family&#8217;s claims for the throne (Jacobitism),  the established Church of England and the gentry.  Later on, the Whigs drew support from the emerging industrial interests  and wealthy merchants, while the Tories drew support from the landed  interests and the British Crown. The Whigs were  originally also known as the &#8220;Country Party&#8221; (as opposed to the Tories,  the &#8220;Court Party&#8221;). By the first half of the 19th century, however, the  Whig political programme came to encompass not only the supremacy of parliament over the monarch and support  for <a title="Free trade" href="http://liberty-finder.com/free-trade">free  trade</a>, but Catholic emancipation, the abolition of <a title="Slavery" href="http://liberty-finder.com/slavery">slavery</a> and, significantly, expansion of the franchise (suffrage). <span style="color: #888888;">(CC Wikipedia 03/27/2010)</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://googliberty.com/british-whig-party/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Edmund Burke</title>
		<link>http://googliberty.com/edmund-burke</link>
		<comments>http://googliberty.com/edmund-burke#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[18th Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberty-finder.com/?p=283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Edmund Burke (1729 – 1797) was an Anglo-Irish statesman, author, orator, political theorist, and philosopher who, after relocating to England, served for many years in the House of Commons of Great Britain as a member of the Whig party. He is mainly remembered for his opposition to the French Revolution. It led to his becoming the leading figure within the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Edmund Burke</strong> (1729 – 1797) was an Anglo-Irish statesman, author, orator, political theorist, and philosopher who, after relocating to England, served for many years in the House of Commons of Great Britain as a member of the Whig party. He is mainly remembered for his opposition to the <a title="French Revolution" href="http://liberty-finder.com/French-Revolution">French Revolution</a>. It led to his becoming the leading figure within the conservative faction of the <a title="British Whig Party" href="http://liberty-finder.com/british-whig-party">Whig party</a>, which he dubbed the &#8220;Old Whigs&#8221;, in opposition to the pro-French-Revolution &#8220;New Whigs&#8221; led by Charles James Fox. Burke lived before the terms &#8220;conservative&#8221; and &#8220;liberal&#8221; were used to describe political ideologies. Burke was praised by both conservatives and liberals in the nineteenth-century and since the twentieth-century he has generally been viewed as the philosophical founder of modern <a title="Conservatism" href="http://liberty-finder.com/conservatism">conservatism</a>. <span style="color: #888888;">(CC Wikipedia &#8211; 03/13/2010)</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://googliberty.com/edmund-burke/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Ricardo</title>
		<link>http://googliberty.com/david-ricardo</link>
		<comments>http://googliberty.com/david-ricardo#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[18th Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[19th Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberty-finder.com/?p=280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Ricardo (1772 – 1823) was an English political economist, often credited with systematizing economics, and was one of the most influential of the classical economists, along with Thomas Malthus and Adam Smith. He was also a member of Parliament, businessman, financier and speculator, who amassed a considerable personal fortune. Perhaps his most important contribution was the theory of comparative advantage, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>David Ricardo</strong> (1772 – 1823) was an English political economist, often credited with systematizing economics, and was one of the most influential of the classical economists, along with <a href="http://liberty-finder.com/thomas-malthus">Thomas Malthus</a> and <a title="Adam Smith" href="http://liberty-finder.com/adam-smith">Adam Smith</a>. He was also a member of Parliament, businessman, financier and speculator, who amassed a considerable personal fortune. Perhaps his most important contribution was the theory of comparative advantage, a fundamental argument in favor of free trade among countries and of specialization among individuals. Ricardo argued that there is mutual benefit from trade (or exchange) even if one party (e.g. resource-rich country, highly-skilled artisan) is more productive in every possible area than its trading counterpart (e.g. resource-poor country, unskilled laborer), as long as each concentrates on the activities where it has a <em>relative</em> productivity advantage. <span style="color: #888888;">(CC Wikipedia &#8211; 03/13/2010)</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://googliberty.com/david-ricardo/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Magna Carta</title>
		<link>http://googliberty.com/magna-carta</link>
		<comments>http://googliberty.com/magna-carta#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Facts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[13th Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberty-finder.com/?p=277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Magna Carta, also called Magna Carta Libertatum (the Great Charter of Freedoms), is an English legal charter, originally issued in the year1215. It was written in Latin and is known by its Latin name. The usual English translation of Magna Carta is Great Charter. Magna Carta required King John of England to proclaim certain rights (pertaining to freemen), respect certain legal procedures, and accept that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Magna Carta</strong>, also called <strong>Magna Carta Libertatum</strong> (the <strong>Great Charter of Freedoms</strong>), is an English legal charter, originally issued in the year1215. It was written in Latin and is known by its Latin name. The usual English translation of <strong>Magna Carta</strong> is <strong>Great Charter</strong>.</p>
<p>Magna Carta required King John of England to proclaim certain rights (pertaining to freemen), respect certain legal procedures, and accept that his will could be bound by the law. It explicitly protected certain rights of the King&#8217;s subjects, whether free or fettered — and implicitly supported what became the writ of <em><a title="Habeas corpus" href="http://liberty-finder.com/Habeas-corpus">habeas corpus</a></em>, allowing appeal against unlawful imprisonment.</p>
<p>Magna Carta was arguably the most significant early influence on the extensive historical process that led to the rule of constitutional law today in the English speaking world. Magna Carta influenced the development of the <a title="Common law" href="http://liberty-finder.com/Common-law">common law</a> and many constitutional documents, including the United States Constitution. Many clauses were renewed throughout the Middle Ages, and continued to be renewed as late as the 18th century. By the second half of the 19th century, however, most clauses in their original form had been repealed from English law.</p>
<p>Magna Carta was the first document forced onto an English King by a group of his subjects (the barons) in an attempt to limit his powers by law and protect their privileges. It was preceded by the 1100 <a title="Charter of Liberties" href="http://liberty-finder.com/Charter-of-Liberties">Charter of Liberties</a> in which King Henry I voluntarily stated that his own powers were under the law.</p>
<p>In practice, Magna Carta in the medieval period mostly did not limit the power of Kings; but by the time of the English Civil War it had become an important symbol for those who wished to show that the King was bound by the law.</p>
<p>Magna Carta is normally understood to refer to a single document, that of 1215. Various amended versions of Magna Carta appeared in subsequent years however, and it is the 1297 version which remains on the statute books of England and Wales. <span style="color: #888888;">(CC Wikipedia &#8211; 03/13/2010)</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://googliberty.com/magna-carta/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Daniel Hannan and the English NHS</title>
		<link>http://googliberty.com/on-daniel-hannan-and-the-english-nhs</link>
		<comments>http://googliberty.com/on-daniel-hannan-and-the-english-nhs#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 04:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current political debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberty-finder.com/?p=228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Searching for informations on the position of the British MEP Daniel Hannan, about the privatization of the National Health Service (NHS), with Liberty-Finder, I&#8217;ve found an interesting video on the Campaign for liberty Website, and a short reflexion on Health System in the Adam Smith Institute Website. You can discuss about this topic on Commerce21.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Searching for informations on the position of the British MEP Daniel Hannan, about the privatization of the National Health Service (NHS), with Liberty-Finder, I&#8217;ve found an <a href="http://www.campaignforliberty.com/blog.php?view=27868">interesting video on the Campaign for liberty Website</a>, and a <a href="http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/health/nhs:-no-health-statism-200908163981/">short reflexion on Health System </a>in the Adam Smith Institute Website.</p>
<p>You can discuss about this topic on <a href="http://www.commerce21.org/topic/39-david-cameron-talking-to-daniel-hannan/">Commerce21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://googliberty.com/on-daniel-hannan-and-the-english-nhs/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bernard Mandeville</title>
		<link>http://googliberty.com/bernard-mandeville</link>
		<comments>http://googliberty.com/bernard-mandeville#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 15:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[18th Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberty-finder.com/?p=161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bernard Mandeville, or Bernard de Mandeville (1670– 1733), was a philosopher, political economist and satirist. Born in the Netherlands, he lived most of his life in England and used English for most of his published works. He became famous (or infamous) for The Fable of the Bees.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bernard Mandeville</strong>, or Bernard de Mandeville (1670– 1733), was a philosopher, political economist and satirist. Born in the Netherlands, he lived most of his life in <a href="http://liberty-finder.com/tag/18th-century">England </a>and used English for most of his published works. He became famous (or infamous) for <em>The Fable of the Bees</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://googliberty.com/bernard-mandeville/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Locke</title>
		<link>http://googliberty.com/john-locke</link>
		<comments>http://googliberty.com/john-locke#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 21:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[17th Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberty-finder.com/?p=105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Locke (1632 – 1704) was an English philosopher. Locke is considered the first of the British empiricists, but is equally important to social contract theory. His ideas had enormous influence on the development of epistemology and political philosophy, and he is widely regarded as one of the most influential Enlightenment thinkers, classical republicans, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Locke (1632 – 1704) was an English philosopher. Locke is considered the first of the British empiricists, but is equally important to social contract theory. His ideas had enormous influence on the development of epistemology and political philosophy, and he is widely regarded as one of the most influential Enlightenment thinkers, classical republicans, and contributors to liberal theory. His writings influenced <a title="Voltaire" href="http://liberty-finder.com/voltaire">Voltaire</a> and Rousseau, many <a title="Scottish Enlightenment" href="http://liberty-finder.com/scottish-enlightenment">Scottish Enlightenment</a> thinkers, as well as the American revolutionaries. This influence is reflected in the <a title="American Declaration of Independence" href="http://liberty-finder.com/american-declaration-of-independence">American Declaration of Independence</a>.</p>
<p>Locke&#8217;s theory of mind is often cited as the origin for modern conceptions of identity and &#8220;the self&#8221;, figuring prominently in the later works of philosophers such as <a title="David Hume" href="http://liberty-finder.com/david-hume">David Hume</a>, Jean-Jacques Rousseau and <a title="Immanuel Kant" href="http://liberty-finder.com/immanuel-kant">Immanuel Kant</a>. Locke was the first philosopher to define the self through a continuity of &#8220;consciousness&#8221;. He also postulated that the mind was a &#8220;blank slate&#8221; or &#8220;tabula rasa&#8221;; that is, contrary to Cartesian or Christian philosophy, Locke maintained that people are born without innate ideas, and that knowledge is instead determined only by experience derived by sense perception.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://googliberty.com/john-locke/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

